I think there is POSSIBILITY that there is something amiss with the numbers.
Incon has 137 more hp at 6k rmp? Thats allot of hp.
Joel
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Delgado [mailto:dadoctah@worldnet.att.net]
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 1998 1:55 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: power/torque curver for blowers/turbo
Err, Uhmm, Oh yeah, "Mok".
Did you look at the charts? I don't know what an incon is, but whatever it
is
it makes a GIANT SHIT-LOAD more HP and TQ than the KB. You are right in that
the KB would do wonders for the Dak. But the incon would blow it it off the
planet!
If they made that incon thingamagig for the dak, I'd sell a kidney to get
one.
BTW, that low rpm stuff only helps rock climbers and heavy haulers; in
street
and strip performance you won't see those revs once you take off.
dadoctah@worldnet.att.net
----------
>From: "Mok, Alan (SPB)" <AMok@spbank.com>
>To: DML <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: DML: power/torque curver for blowers/turbo
>Date: Wed, Dec 30, 1998, 9:51 PM
>
>Wonder which power adder is best for you?
>
>Here are some numbers off a dynojet for 3 similar Moostangs. The major
>difference being the way it get pressurized air.
>
>I think the KB would do wonders for Daks considering the torque/power
curve.
>
>
>
>
>
>'98 Dakota R/T (JBA shorties, Big K&N;TB & shiftkit soon)
>'89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs GR-40 , Vortech S-trim...)
>Ducati 996 (not while my wife is alive)
>
> INCON KENNE BELL S-TRIM
> RPM TQ HP TQ HP TQ HP RPM
>2500 325 155 400 209 280 133 2500
>2750 355 185 410 215 295 155 2750
>3000 420 240 420 240 310 177 3000
>3250 470 290 425 263 320 198 3250
>3500 525 350 430 286 340 227 3500
>3750 560 400 430 307 355 254 3750
>4000 575 438 430 328 370 282 4000
>4250 575 466 427 346 375 304 4250
>4500 570 489 425 364 385 330 4500
>4750 560 507 415 375 385 348 4750
>5000 555 528 400 381 375 357 5000
>5250 540 540 390 390 360 360 5250
>5500 520 545 380 398 351 368 5500
>5750 490 536 365 400 338 370 5750
>6000 470 537 350 400 325 371 6000
>
>
>All of these are approximations from reading the torque values on the chart
>and then plugging them into the above formula. For a really good discussion
>of HP vs TQ, see the web page:
>http://www.ns.net/~seang/resource/torquehp.html
><http://www.ns.net/~seang/resource/torquehp.html>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:11:35 EDT