Re: Age?? -- Was Observation

From: Alan Short (ashort@flash.net)
Date: Thu Jan 14 1999 - 14:09:47 EST

Next message: Chad: "Re: Age?? ATTN:Steiger"
Previous message: Phillip Fortney: "Re: Phillip, Need More data..."
In reply to: Steve: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Next in thread: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Reply: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Steve wrote:
>
> Wow! A lot of wet-behind-the-ears whipper-snappers!
> I guess at 35 I must qualify for geezer status. :(
>
> Patiently waiting for delivery,
> Steve

Got ya by a little. 37 in March. Alan S.

Next message: Chad: "Re: Age?? ATTN:Steiger"
Previous message: Phillip Fortney: "Re: Phillip, Need More data..."
In reply to: Steve: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Next in thread: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Reply: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:01 EDT