Re: Age?? -- Was Observation
From: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian (leefam@wcc.net)
Date: Fri Jan 15 1999 - 15:18:35 EST
- Next message: Lynne M. Ellsworth: "Re: Snow Morons"
- Previous message: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Phillip, Need More data..."
- In reply to: Alan Short: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Next in thread: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Reply: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
At 01:09 PM 1/14/1999 -0600, you wrote:
>Steve wrote:
>>
>> Wow! A lot of wet-behind-the-ears whipper-snappers!
>> I guess at 35 I must qualify for geezer status. :(
>>
>> Patiently waiting for delivery,
>> Steve
>
> Got ya by a little. 37 in March. Alan S.
>
>
Hmm...I'm 19!! Old people!! hehe...j/k! =)
This thread is really interesting! In my town, you are either really
young(i.e.17-22), or they actually are old - like 65+!! I don't see many
people in their late 20's or 30's with Daks.
Brian
- Next message: Lynne M. Ellsworth: "Re: Snow Morons"
- Previous message: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Phillip, Need More data..."
- In reply to: Alan Short: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Next in thread: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Reply: Jim, Donna, Erin, and Brian: "Re: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: Age?? -- Was Observation"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:01 EDT