Re: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money

From: Patrick Delgado (dadoctah@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu Jan 28 1999 - 02:29:44 EST


Because they up the timing on the Performance comp. Same reason Jet II's use
180F stats.
Dr. Pat

----------
>From: Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: RE: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
>Date: Thu, Jan 28, 1999, 4:00 AM
>

> Why does Mopar Performance suggest you need to use 92 octane with the
> performance computer? I know, they must own oil company stock right.
> Seriously, why do they include a sticker for the instrument panel and the
> tank door?
>
> VLADIMIR
> 96 Indy "FASRAM"
> http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
> http://www.indyram.org/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> Sweet350cc@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 5:32 AM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
>
>
> for those people with stock compression,im telling you this.you are wasting
> your money on 93 octane and octance boost.it will not make you go faster it
> will more than likely slow you down since higher octane burns slower than 87
> would.higher octane was designed for higher compression motors.i thought
> that
> i would share a little secrect to all dak loverslike myself.
>
> Roman
> 99 cc R/T
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:17 EDT