RE: RE: First night at the track

From: Bridges, Bruce (bbridges@alarismed.com)
Date: Thu Jan 28 1999 - 14:42:22 EST


Alan,
Best MPH at the end of the 1/4 is 90.72 (Ive gone faster but the damn timing
system was caput...) Supposedly a 91.2 mph after unloading about 250lbs
from the truck, but NOOOO traction at all.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Mok, Alan (SPB) [mailto:AMok@spbank.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 11:30 AM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: RE: First night at the track

What's the MPH?

That will give a good indication or the HP he's making.

ET is more about traction and driving abilities.

Alan

'98 Dakota R/T (JBA shorties, Big K&N;TB & shiftkit soon)
'89 Mustang GT (347, Griggs GR-40 , Vortech S-trim...)

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Bridges, Bruce [mailto:bbridges@alarismed.com]
                Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 11:11 AM
                To: 'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'
                Subject: RE: DML: RE: First night at the track

                Again the mirror,
                Carlsbad raceway is challenging my buddies F body. He too is
embarrased by
                his times and feels it when he posts to the F body list...
His set up
                includes a 6psi Vortech and all the bolt ons you can get...
dynoing at over
                355hp to the rear wheels, and his times are a best of 12.85
and worst of
                13.98...Maybe its that stream crossing at the 1/8th mile or
something...
                BKB

                -----Original Message-----
                From: Alan Short [mailto:ashort@flash.net]
                Sent: Thursday, January 28, 1999 1:01 PM
                To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
                Subject: Re: DML: RE: First night at the track

                ZXiMan@aol.com wrote:
>
> Jason,
>
> That '98 C5 Corvette was an automatic too, right?
Most six speed
                C5s
> when run at the track get very close to the 12.99s (could
do it with
                better
> tires than the stock EMTs for sure). My '99 6-speed runs a
best of
                13.02@111
> mph.....The EMTs kinda suck for traction!
>
> But to be honest, the R/T is just about as much
fun. It gets
                almost
> the same amount of attention!
>
> James Crone
> Performance Engineering
> 940-321-5865
                Hmmm. Another testament to the slowness of TX Motorplex, as
far as stock
                vehicles are concerned anyway. A racin buddy of mine has a
'98 C5 Conv.
                6spd. He whittled and worked all night to a 14.2 best.
Slowest was 14.5.
                That seems about normal for what I see from the C5's. NEVER
seen a 13
                from one. But hey, thats just my experience. I'm not saying
faster
                times don't happen, I just don't see them. Alan S.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:17 EDT