thanks for the response, but, that is far from the answer I was looking for.
I was trying to make a point. Oh well...
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
HEMI@charter.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 1999 10:16 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: RE: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
Because one of the things that the MP computer does is advance the timing
which requires high octane fuel .
At 10:00 PM 1/27/99 -0600, you wrote:
>Why does Mopar Performance suggest you need to use 92 octane with the
>performance computer? I know, they must own oil company stock right.
>Seriously, why do they include a sticker for the instrument panel and the
>tank door?
>
>VLADIMIR
>96 Indy "FASRAM"
>http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>http://www.indyram.org/
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>Sweet350cc@aol.com
>Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 1999 5:32 AM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: 104 Octane boost... waste of money
>
>
>for those people with stock compression,im telling you this.you are wasting
>your money on 93 octane and octance boost.it will not make you go faster it
>will more than likely slow you down since higher octane burns slower than
87
>would.higher octane was designed for higher compression motors.i thought
>that
>i would share a little secrect to all dak loverslike myself.
>
> Roman
> 99 cc R/T
>
>
>
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Jack Hilton III
http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:20 EDT