REPLY IMPROFECTION

From: Sweet350cc@aol.com
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 22:05:29 EST

Next message: John van Gemert: "Re: bad vibrations!!!"
Previous message: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: Proctologists...was Rubber seals/weather stripping"
Next in thread: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Reply: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Dennis Pendleton: "Re:REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Reply: Mike Crumley: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Brucklacher, Brett: "RE: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: John van Gemert: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Mike Crumley: "RE: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

WHY IS IT EVERY TIME I WRITE SOMETHING TO U GUYS THE FIRST COUPLE OF SENTENCES
ARE CUT OFF???IM I DOING SOMETHING WRONG?

ROMAN
99 R/T

Next message: John van Gemert: "Re: bad vibrations!!!"
Previous message: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: Proctologists...was Rubber seals/weather stripping"
Next in thread: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Reply: HEMI@charter.net: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Dennis Pendleton: "Re:REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Reply: Mike Crumley: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Brucklacher, Brett: "RE: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Sweet350cc@aol.com: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: John van Gemert: "Re: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Maybe reply: Mike Crumley: "RE: REPLY IMPROFECTION"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:32 EDT