RE: E.T. VS. MPH

From: Jason Jennings (jason@spray-tech.com)
Date: Thu Feb 11 1999 - 17:02:57 EST


hahahahahaha..... I have a 14.84 @ 90.4 MPH and a 15 flat around 89 in
change not too mention a 15.40 @ 87.

Jason
2/11/99 5:07 PM

        -----Original Message-----
        From: Dave Rench [SMTP:renchd@krause.com]
        Sent: Thursday, February 11, 1999 4:09 PM
        To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
        Subject: DML: E.T. VS. MPH

        With the conversation regarding E.T's vs. MPH and our Dakota's
outstanding
        8 ^ ) aerodynamic efficiency, I thought some of you might find
this
        interesting. It was posted on the Oldsmobile Mail List. It
correlates
        theoretical e.t.s with mph. I.E. for a given mph you should turn
X e.t.
        assuming good traction, fairly optimized gearing etc. Kind of
interesting
        and correlates pretty well with my Dakota's times and speed.

        MPH ET
                                
        83 16.30
        84 16.11
        85 15.92
        86 15.73
        87 15.55
        88 15.38
        89 15.20
        90 15.03
        91 14.87
        92 14.71
        93 14.55
        94 14.39
        95 14.24

        Dave Rench
        1997 Dakota RC V-8 &
        1970 Olds Cutlass W-31
        http://www.krause.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:34 EDT