Hey!
Just did this on Monday.
Ultra-FLO (round) stainless muffler, 3" in/out... 3" pipe
from front of muffler to the CAT. 3" pipe on rear of
muffler split into dual 2.25" pipes... then dual 2.25"
pipes to side exits (one on right side (oem), and one on
the left side) with 3.5" chrome slash cut (like OEM, just
bigger) tips.
Cost- $343.05 installed (Ultra-FLO is an expensive,
STAINLESS muffler)...
Sound? Mellow, louder than stock, deeper, but not obnoxious.
Power? So far, off the line acceleration seems either better or
no change-- which is good... meaning the backpressure is
correct with the OBD-II computer.
Nothing like starting up in the morning, and seeing the exhaust
condensation from BOTH sides of the truck pooring out!!!
Sound would be similar to that of a 5.0L (yuck) mustand with duals
(stock), but a LOT deeper/mellow in sound.
As soon as I get well enough to get my butt out to record a sound
clip, I'll post it to the DML page.
Sam '99 RT
-----Original Message-----
From: SuperNagz@aol.com <SuperNagz@aol.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 5:22 PM
Subject: DML: Good exhaust for '99 R/T
>When I get my new '99 DAK R/T, one of the first things I will look to
upgrade
>is the exhaust. However, something I have noticed on past cars is that
>aftermarket exhaust is a tough thing to deal with..
>I basicaly went through 2 or 3 different setups on my current car before
>finding something that sounded good... it gets to be very expensive, and
time
>consuming...
>So, I'm hoping with the help of you guys, I can make the right choice the
>first time
>
>Does any exhaust manf. (FLowmaster, Dynomax, etc) make a good free-flowing
>exhaust with dual rear tailpipes?? (it must sound good...)
>
>Basicaly, I'm looking for something that will sound really good (not
loud...
>but a little louder than stock) Performance isn't really a factor, because
>most likely it would be negligable
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:37 EDT