I heard if you take your radio antenna off you can get close to 10 hp.
Man wouldn't that be nice if were true.
Mike Sype
---Robert Trottmann <rotrottmann@davidson.edu> wrote:
>
> Yes, it was 220, minus 10% equals 217.8 hp stock.....plus DT
headers, Y pipe,
> cat back, MP SBEC, ram air hood, F&B TB, 180 Tstat, 8.5mm wires, MSD
6AL.....I
> think there is a possibility that I could maybe be a little over
250....just
> maybe. Plus my 16X8 Centerlines add a few horses for looks. :-)
> Later,
> Robert
>
> Chris lang wrote:
>
> > Wasnt it 220 HP on the older magnums?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mrdancer <mrdancer@camalott.com>
> > To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:39 PM
> > Subject: DML: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
> >
> > >Well, given the tolerances of factory motors, I'd say that 230hp
as claimed
> > >by Chrysler could vary + or - 10%.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Michael Z-Sykes <msykes@su.edu>
> > >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> > >Date: Wednesday, February 17, 1999 9:09 PM
> > >Subject: DML: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames
> > >
> > >
> > >>>>C- Did I state my hp at 250? I wouldn't be suprised if it was
pretty
> > >>close
> > >>to that, or over. Talk to you after I make it to the Dyno<<<
> > >>
> > >>lets take a look at this....
> > >>stock motor 230 hp (as claimed by CC)
> > >>add headers... 15 hp
> > >>FABM... 5 hp..
> > >>
> > >>now get out your calculators boys and girls.. that equals 250!
and that's
> > >>not all of R/T's mods, so I would say he has OVER 250... gee
Robert, I
> > >>guess you were wrong =)
> > >>
> > >>-mike d.
> > >
> > >
>
>
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:37 EDT