Re: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames

From: mrdancer (mrdancer@camalott.com)
Date: Thu Feb 18 1999 - 19:33:21 EST


Yes, you may be right, and I do have a pretty good crimp in my y-pipe. I
had read in a MoPar rag that there was a cam change tho' - just a slight
redesign of the horsepower and torque curves, but I'm not sure which way
they went......

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard A Pyburn <rap777@juno.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Thursday, February 18, 1999 9:16 AM
Subject: DML: Re: stickin' up for R/T was: licence plate flames

>I was under the impression that the drop in HP and increase in torque
>came in '94 and was due to the big ol' crimp in the y pipe. Does your
>'92 y pipe look mashed? Any time anyone's under my truck who's not
>familiar with a Dak always says, "Wow, you musta hit some big rock! Look
>at this pipe! It's all pressed together." Of course, what they don't
>think about is how smooth the crimp is compared to what it would look
>like if it had been hit by a rock or something.
>
>Anyhow, what's the deal with the cam? What was the change?
>
>Richard in SA
>
>On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 22:17:05 -0600 mrdancer <mrdancer@camalott.com>
>writes:
>>My '92 is rated at 230hp - I think the following year they dropped it
>>to
>>220hp & boosted torque by about 10lb-ft. - think they changed the cam
>>a
>>little.......
>>
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
>Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
>or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:38 EDT