No... You cannot get the 5.9L AND the 5 speed in any 94+ 1500 ram (NV3500
not rated for torque of 5.9L)... same reason you can''t get a 5 speed in the
Dak R/T... I'll guess that if they offer the 5.9L in a '00 4x4, you won't be
able to get a 5 speed, either.
You can get the 5.9L and a 5 speed in a 2500 or 3500 (they use the NV4500)
Gary Shook
>uuhh.. okay.. DID they make the SS/T with a 5 spd? =)
>
>-mike d.
>
>>>> <HEMI@charter.net> 02/24/99 09:37pm >>>
>They no longer make the SS/T .
>
>
>
>At 09:08 PM 2/24/99 -0500, you wrote:
>>Yeah! Do they make a 5spd for the SS/T rams? I would say auto is the
>>way to go considering that's the only option in the R/T....
>>
>>-mike d.
>>
>>>>> Vladimir Ryall <vladimir@austin.rr.com> 02/24/99 12:05am >>>
>>missing a shift still constitutes a race... I shall not mis-shift my
auto,
>>and would not trade it in on any manual trans, too inconsistent...
>>
>>Vladimir "FASRAM"
>>Home: http://home.austin.rr.com/fasram/
>>Member: http://www.indyram.org/
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>>dakota_5sp_v8
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 10:51 PM
>>To: DML
>>Subject: RE: DML: Re: 5 Speed vs. Automatic
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>if you want to lose 10 hp get the auto
>>
>>if you want to through revs between shifts get the 5 sp
>>
>>Joel
>>
>>http://www.zracer.com/dakota.htm
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Glen Renzoni [mailto:glenzoni@totacc.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 1999 12:32 AM
>>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>>Subject: Re: DML: Re: 5 Speed vs. Automatic
>>
>>
>>if you like broken transmissions -- 5-speed
>>
>>if you like consistency at the track -- Automatic
>>
>>> If you like to steer -- Automatic.
>>>
>>> If you like to drive -- 5 Spd!!!
>>
>>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>Jack Hilton III
>
>HEMI@charter.net
>
>http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:44 EDT