fawcett@uism.bu.edu wrote:
>
> Hehehe... Good point Doc. I think all Dak owners should own a bike as
> well. I think the compression on my bike is 11:1... MPG is something like
> 30MPG @ 100MPH (and that's driving conservative!)
> WooHoo!!! :::::::-------)))))))
>
> T.
> ______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
> Subject: Re: DML: R/T SBEC (Computer) Rag session
> Author: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net> at smtpout
> Date: 2/27/99 8:07 PM
>
> The best engine configuration for power *and* economy is a high compression
> engine running high octane gas. Unfortunately, high compression produces
> unacceptable levels of certain pollutants (but less *overall* pollutants).
> What we need is a sensible EPA. Today's EPA can't see the forest cause the
> trees are in the way.
> Dr. Pat
> ----------
> >From: David Henry <dhenry@advdata.net>
> >To: "'DML'" <dakota-truck-digest@buffnet4.buffnet.net>
> >Subject: RE: DML: R/T SBEC (Computer) Rag session
> >Date: Sat, Feb 27, 1999, 9:13 PM
> >
> > think it would be great if the computer could adjust itself for driving
> > conditions on the fly. Ideal toy would be dual fuel tanks / pumps /
> > injectors with different octane gas in it. The computer can adjust timing
> > fuel as needed to use low octane gas when at highway cruising speeds, but
> > when the go pedal either makes a sudden change, or goes more that 3/4 of
> > the down it can start dumping in the high octane fuel and messing with
> > timing so that you can fly! Best of both worlds economy & power. Ok,
> > enough rambling...
> >
> > David Henry '94 CC 4x4 318 5Spd in MI
> >
Yea a Bike! Is this a Harley thing?.......or will my Gold Wing work? Bob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:12:46 EDT