That could be, I've seen a few newer DAK's and the engine look alot more crammed
in then on mine? I will keep the list posted as the project unfolds.
"psychonaut"
Mopar Ed wrote:
> i would imagine there is a diff with the 92 style daks and the 97+ style
> daks, but yes please find out
>
> Ed
>
> Thomas Vacchino wrote:
> >
> > An 8" filter?.......That's strange because he told me the airbox was design
> > for a 14" element and that he thought the v-6 used a 10". When I told him I
> > had a K&N 14", he siad it shouldn't be a problem then. Well I'll find out in
> > a couple weeks!
> >
> > "psychonaut"
> >
> > Mopar Ed wrote:
> >
> > > i talked to terry also, and he said to look for a 8" air cleaner, i
> > > found a 7" and a 9", but i had no luck finding a 8x2.5 (or 3") setup
> > >
> > > Ed
> > > 98 dakgts
> > >
> > > Thomas Vacchino wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ok,
> > > > I just got off the phone with Terry @ PROGLASS and ordered my Hood and
> > > > Air box for my '92 V-6. Terry says he's never tried this set-up on a
> > > > V-6 before (to make it functional). But after I took some measurements
> > > > under the Hood, I don't see why it shouldn't so I'm gonna be the test
> > > > DAK for a functional Ram Air Hood on a V-6!! I'll let you all know how
> > > > it comes out or if I need any advice during the process. So all you
> > > > V-6er's on the list, keep your fingers crossed!!!!!
> > > >
> > > > "psychonaut"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:24 EDT