Dual 2.5" is too big, and you'll get a nasty computer code...
Dual 2.25" is what I went with, and performance is up... I run
the straight through Ultra Flo too... Plus, try to get a dual setup,
with 2.5" around your spare tire... There's no room. I'll dig out
my camera, and take some pictures of my setup.
Sam '99 RT RC 14.889 @ 92 mph... woo hoo!
----- Original Message -----
From: jim miller <jmiller@texnet.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, April 05, 1999 7:55 PM
Subject: DML: Dynomax better than Flowmaster
> > I would like to hear any comments on the Walker Dynomax Ultra Flo. I am
> > weighing this vs a Gibson single exit system. Seems alot cheaper way to
go,
> > keeping the 2& a half pipes for low end torque and gaining some rumble
and
> > performance, tho I do not want loud in the cab. Weighing the 2 options
and
> > would like some input, thanks.
> >
>
> I believe the Ultra flow is probably one of the best flowing performance
> mufflers available. I don't know what is inside the Gibson, but the ultra
flow
> is straight through design. I don't understand why anyone uses a
flowmaster
> for a performance muffler when it has baffles which have to create
backpressure
> and lower exhaust efficiency resulting in less horsepower.
> I don't think less power is what any of us want! I plan to get the 3"in
dual
> 2.5" out for my R/T with dual tailpipes. I already have the Mopar headers
so I
> believe that will be the best improvement I can buy.
> Jim in Waco
> 99 R/T RC "Dakshak"
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:39 EDT