Re: Re: 13.72 Lighning

From: Michael Clark (magnumv8@wt.net)
Date: Fri Apr 09 1999 - 23:11:41 EDT


That's still impressive for a full size truck. Have they upped the
performance of the mustang gt's? I can't imagine ferd building a truck
that's faster than their "sports car"

---Mike, near Houston.--- http://www.mikesdakota.com
                   '93 V8 4X2
Houston Area DML Meet Page
     http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/downs/9221

----- Original Message -----
From: Mark Kuzia <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, April 09, 1999 9:56 PM
Subject: DML: Re: 13.72 Lighning

> I hope you realize that those times are BULL! Their times were .8 quicker
> than everyone elses. I love that magazine, but thier 1/4 mile times are
full
> of it!
>
> Mark Kuzia
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patrick Delgado <dadoctah@worldnet.att.net>
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
> Date: Friday, April 09, 1999 6:29 PM
> Subject: DML: 13.72 Lighning
>
>
> >Just got my Truckin'. The Lightning did 13.718 @ 99.939mph in the Truck
Of
> the
> >Year competition. This is bone stock, no mods. It seems like it went
> slower
> >when C&D tested it.
> >Anyhow, my point is that they admitted that the Ford *badly* beat the
> >chebby(15.25@88) in *every* category but that they couldn't in a clear
> >concience(???) give the ford the win over the chebby because of
"production
> >numbers". What a quandry they were in; on one hand you have a clear
> >winner(ford) on the other hand you've got their biggest advertiser. Oh
me,
> Oh
> >my, What should we do? "I KNOW" shouted a geek in the corner "We'll call
it
> a
> >tie!"
> >What a crock of shit. (Zipping up my nomex suit) I wonder if a Lightning
> can
> >fit through my garage door?
> >Dr. Pat
> >
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:41 EDT