Yes, the baby was strapped in properly, b/c right after the accident I saw
her take the baby and she/he/it was in a baby seat type device.
Blake
'93 LE Silver/White
4x2 Auto
5.2L 318cu V-8
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Tuesday, April 13, 1999 4:13 PM
Subject: Re: DML: Dak Accident takes a horrible turn
>I can't imagine Whiplash @ 10mph. As for the baby, that's what baby-seats
>are for. I wonder if the babyseat was strapped in correctly...if it was,
>there's NO WAY the baby could have received any "bodily damage".
>
>Personally, it sounds like someone is "Sue Happy" which in turn is a poor
>excuse for a human being. (My honest opinion.)
>
>Unfortunately, you may need an attorney for this one. Sorry to hear it
>happen to you.
>
>Regards,
>
>
>
>At 03:48 PM 04/13/1999 -0500, you wrote:
>>Well folks, my Dak days may be up. That Expedition that I hit filed an
>>insurance claim today, claiming personal injury to the driver and to the
>>passenger(a baby)
>>Is it possible to get whiplash(the only conceivable injury I could imagine
>>from this) in a tank(Expedition) @ 10 mph? If they had injuries, shouldnt
I
>>have? Also, she had time to brace for the impact b/c she even said she saw
>>me coming in her rear view mirror. I cant believe this is happening to me.
>>Its not like these people need the money or anything..she drives a 98
>>Expedition and him a 99 Z-71 Pickup. Any advice?
>>
>>Blake
>>'93 LE Silver/White
>>4x2 Auto
>>5.2L 318cu V-8
>>
>
>Bernd D. Ratsch
>Pflugerville, TX
>http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
>1997 Dodge Dakota SLT/CC (V6)
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:44 EDT