I found this article for all of you who read this guy's comments.
http://www.motortrend.com/july97/ramd/ramd_f.html
Tony
-----Original Message-----
From: 4x4dakv8@iname.com <4x4dakv8@iname.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 3:22 PM
Subject: DML: alt.dodge.trucks
>DML Gang:
>
>Maybe you'd like to visit Bill's website and explain the benefits of
Dakotas to him. He's been posting this sort of crap to the alt.dodge.trucks
ng for a few weeks now.
>
>4x4dakv8
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>Well, if you've made it as far as the Dodge dealership, dig a little deeper
>and go for the Ram. Don't even play around with those little Dakotas. Just
>do it right the first time (unless, of course, you and your family happen
to
>be midgets or something - then, by all means - buy the Dakota)...
>
>--
>-Bill Cabiness, Webmaster of the Dodge Ram Truck Page
>http://members.xoom.com/badge218
>V10Dually@hotmail.com
>
>
>-------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>OK, maybe I should have been more SPECIFIC. I have heard nothing but
>complaints about the Dakotas, while I have not heard many complaints at all
>about the Rams. Are they 2 completely different trucks? YES INDEED. It just
>seems like the Ram is A LOT more reliable than the Dakota. The Dakota may
be
>smaller, cost less, and habdle better (so YOU say) than a Ram, but it won't
>be doing you much good in the back seat of a Taxi while your more
economical
>Dakota is in the shop (AGAIN). I hope this clears up my previous statement.
>
>--
>-Bill Cabiness, Webmaster of the Dodge Ram Truck Page
>http://members.xoom.com/badge218
>V10Dually@hotmail.com
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>Get free personalized email at http://www.iname.com
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:59 EDT