Rich,
I could buy that excuse for the 97's(like mine). But what excuse could they
possibly come up with for not fixing the problems on the 98's and 99's. Face
it, the Dak was a financial success. They're making tons of money on it.
They're not servicing them, it's impossible to get anything fixed under
warantee unless you've got the determination of a pitbull.
As long as people keep buying them, there's no need to fix them.
Dr. Pat
----------
>From: "Wisotzkey, Rich" <Rich.Wisotzkey@gsc.gte.com>
>To: "'dakota-truck@buffnet.net'" <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: RE: DML: Ball Joints
>Date: Tue, May 11, 1999, 11:31 AM
>
> Think about this, it makes sense. This is a redesigned truck. They not
> only changed the body style, but the suspension as well. They took
> something that wasn't broke, tried to improve it, and screwed it up in the
> process. Give them a couple years (maybe longer with out admittance) to
> straighten it out. This is the prime reason I try to avoid any new model
> product after a redesign. They inevitably have problems that always bite
> the consumer, but rarely affect the manufacturer. Hopefully DC will come
> around to backing their goods sooner than maybe later.
> Rich - Ashburn, VA
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:13:59 EDT