Re: attn: Bernd, IAT Sensor...Answer.

From: Mark Kuzia (flyboy01@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Thu Jun 24 1999 - 23:23:19 EDT


What is the E-ram? Did I miss something?

Mark Kuzia

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Kuzia <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Thursday, June 24, 1999 11:07 PM
Subject: DML: Re: IAT Sensor...Answer.

|Thats what I plan to do. I also did some more testing on mine and other
|peoples dakotas and found it was worth 1-2 tenths. I did try the the
coolant
|temp sensor trick, but the results are inconclusive. But the final results
|are in on the It sensor trick, I used a pot at first and found that 4k ohms
|was the best value to use. The resistor (I used a 3.9K ohm) should be wired
|instead of and not in series with the sensor.
|
|As far as using on the street, I have found it does not have any adverse
|effect other that milage might be a little lower.
|
|Mark Kuzia
|
|-----Original Message-----
|From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
|To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|Date: Thursday, June 24, 1999 6:51 PM
|Subject: DML: IAT Sensor...Idea?
|
|
||
||Now whoever it was that uses/used the resistor across the IAT sensor, you
||mentioned that you ran it with the resistor ON at the track but removed it
||for normal everyday driving. What about putting the resistor on a
||Micro-Switch (like what I did for the E-Ram) which only enables the
|resistor
||at WOT. (Fuel enrichment...possibly??)
||
||Ideas?
||
||
||
|
|
|



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:29 EDT