I'm not going there anymore.... ;)
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Aaron
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 5:04 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: Rear Wheel Horsepower
so basically what your saying is, everyone should have gotten manuals and
not auto's or r/t's. that's what I thought, I'd take my 5.2 manual over a
r/t any day. I believe the manuals have won another contest. Let me go get
my armor proof suit on now for all the replies.
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Friday, June 25, 1999 8:02 AM
Subject: RE: DML: Rear Wheel Horsepower
>
> If you're loosing that much power due to the driveline, you may want to
find
> an alternative solution before putting anything else on the vehicle.
Also,
> let me clarify this: the 200HP mark that I gave was a very general
example.
>
> 400HP FW and 270HP RW?? That's a 130HP loss and not even worth the money
> anymore. As I said, if you're loosing that much HP through the
driveline,
> you've got a problem. Normally there shouldn't be more than a 20-30% max
> loss.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:29 EDT