Re: To R/T or not R/T

From: Bob King (k85go76@erols.com)
Date: Mon Jun 28 1999 - 19:55:30 EDT


THERE IS NO GOOD SUBSTITUTE FOR CUBIC INCHES!!!!! (Moses)
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: W. Jack Hilton III <HEMI@charter.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Monday, June 28, 1999 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: DML: To R/T or not R/T

>At 07:08 AM 6/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
>>Opinion time:
>>
>>I found a black loaded CC black R/T on the dealers lot, and am torn
between
>>this unit or waiting for the 4.7 in the 2000. What's the group thoughts
>>here?
>
>
>Hmmmmmmm , a 5.9 or a 4.7 ?...........I would take the 360 !
>
>
>
>
>>
>>Intended usage: Daily driver, occasional light hauling household stuff.
>>
>
>
>Great , as long as you don't have to pull a trailer over 2k pounds .
>
>
>>Concerns: Mileage - Out on the flats, keeping you foot out of it, what is
a
>>reasonable MPG achieved with this unit?
>>
>
>Well , gas mileage is not the R/T , or any other Mopar's strongpoint . I
>was able to coax 20MPG out of mine when it had about 15k miles on a very
>long trip to VA back around Turkey Day of 98 . This meant not going over 60
>MPH AT ALL .
>If you go over 60 , or 2000 RPM , the mileage drops fast .
>
>I went on another long trip to FL last summer and without running the AC I
>got 15-16 MPG running about 75-80 MPH .
>
>Don't buy the truck if you need something to get good mileage , get it to
>drive it .
>
>
>>Any other pros / cons?
>>
>
>Nope , just the towing issue , so decide if you will ever have to tow more
>than 2000 pounds *before* you buy it .
>
>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>W. Jack Hilton III
>
>HEMI@charter.net
>
>http://webpages.charter.net/hemi/jbd1.html
>
>ICQ#: 32611901
>
>AOL Instant Messenger: "DwnSth69"
>
>@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:31 EDT