Re: Exhaust question

From: Derek Brooks (DEREK00@prodigy.net)
Date: Wed Jun 30 1999 - 21:42:17 EDT


I have a 98RT/RC and a v6 Ram, don't bother with the muffler on the v6 just
have a pipe put in it's place. The cat will quiet it down enough. But a v8
would be too loud for daily driving with no muffler.

-----Original Message-----
From: jesse <pojess@home.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Wednesday, June 30, 1999 10:32 PM
Subject: DML: Exhaust question

>I don't understand the cat-back exhaust upgrade. I looked under my
>Dakota and found that the exhaust from the CC back are at least 2.5 to
>3 inches in diamater, but the pipes from the engine were a lot smaller
>(maybe 1.5 to 2 inches). It seems that if I were only going to do a
>cat-back upgrade, I could save some money and just upgrade the muffler
>(free flow) and not get the piping. Does this make sense? Does anyone
>know if the stock pipes are mandrel bent.? Does it make that much of a
>differnce for a soon to be slightly modified truck? Any comments?
>
>1997 cc v6 auto
>soon to have 10" 360 degree air filter w/2.5 k&n filter, Jet power
>module, Gibson cat-back (depends on answers from post)



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:32 EDT