My question is this. Wouldn't the e-ram when the vehicle is not at wot restrict
airflow? I've seen the pics on the web page and the fan blades are large and it
seens that it would restrict airflow. It seems you would start reducing the
airflow back towards the point of the stock air intake. It seems that the e-ram
would work better if it was a variable device that accelerated as the vehicle
accelerated. When the throttle body opens up more the e-ram speeds up therefore
pushing more air at the appropriate times, not just at wot. I like the idea and
have been very curious but was wondering about this. Not flaming or discounting
the idea just covering all of the bases.
Jeff Durling
'96 RC Sport
Bernd D. Ratsch wrote:
> Since we've all been talking about RamAIR, Cool Air Systems, etc...here's
> something interesting for you all....
>
> Just let them know of the basic formula for ram air. It is little known and
> generally misunderstood.
>
> Max ram at 80 mph is .08psi. max ram at 180 mph is .4psi (thats point 4
> psi !!) This is with a 75% efficient inlet like on a dragster, that you
> would never have with your daily truck/car. (Try 25 to 50% , best
> case!!)
>
> You can't get around physics, everyone tries. Anyway, this is right out of
> Carroll Smith's "Tune to Win" racing book, as well as a basic known fact in
> aerodynamics. (kind of easy to calculate.)
>
> No matter what the shape of the inlet , (funnel, scoop, horn, etc) it
> doesn't matter, ram just does not exist for our cars.
>
> This is where the eRAM comes into play. It just takes unused electrical energy
> in the battery, and creates a 200 mph ram air system (at WOT).
>
> Ps . here is the formula for ram potential:
> Air Density in lbs per cubic foot
> X Velocity in feet per sec squared divided by 288X32.2 (all times the
> efficiency factor)
>
> Group buy anyone??? ;)
>
> Bernd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:14:58 EDT