From: <boydmcguire@mindspring.com
> Id say 4.7L for a couple of reasons.
> 1) Engineers dont just throw new engines into cars w/o testing them first.
> Im sure this engine has been tested, retested, and then tested again.
> 2) Your always going to have to settle for year old parts
> 3) There is obviously a reason why they have come out with a new engine,
its
> probably an improvement over the 5.2L. Id take their word for it.
>
> Blake
Hmm.... sounds funny to me considering the R/T was supposed to be able to
tow a whole bunch more than it now can.... and they must have tested it and
retested it..... see what you get when you take marketing hype for fact??
Preacher
99 5.2L CC 4x4 SLT+
http://www.bastaards.org
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:14 EDT