Here's the story on non Ca. emissions vehicles
-----Original Message-----
From: bwilliams@dclusa.com <bwilliams@dclusa.com>
To: panthony@pcn.com <panthony@pcn.com>
Date: Friday, July 30, 1999 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: DML: CA Emissions VS. OR Emissions
>pay a $350 one time penalty...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Peter L Anthony [mailto:panthony@pcn.com]
>Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 12:31 PM
>To: Bill Williams
>Subject: Fw: DML: CA Emissions VS. OR Emissions
>
>
>Hey, Just to set the record straight, what did you have to do when you
moved
>to Ca. I regards to registering your non Ca. emissions car?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob Mankin <bob@cadpros.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Friday, July 30, 1999 2:29 PM
>Subject: Re: DML: CA Emissions VS. OR Emissions
>
>
>>Sam Parthemer wrote:
>>>
>>> Check with the DMV, as they are the ones that will let you know the
>>> laws. I was told that a 49 state Federal car wouldn't be
>>> able to register in CA. unless you are in the military, a while
>>> back. Because it is a commercial vehicle, maybe the laws are different.
>>> Best bet to check with the DMV.
>>
>>Sam,
>>
>>This wouldn't make sense or be fair. It would cause anyone moving to
>>Calif to have to sell their car ;) I believe the way it works is you get
>>spanked with the fee initially, then in subsequent years there is some
>>note on your registration that exempts you from the same stringent CA
>>emissions test.
>>
>>But as you say, the best source would be contacting the DMV for the
>>straight poop.
>>
>>Bob
>>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:28 EDT