there's something not too far off of this for the neon... it's called a
TEC-II by Electromotive... no individual o2 sensors, but individual throttle
bodies for each cylinder... it's pretty trick and makes alot of power!
>
>Now Bruce... we had this discussion several months ago... I'm talking an
>"add-on" mod to either a stock TB or an improved one on a stock intake, and
>here you go totally changing the rules of engagement... ^_^
>
> As I recall the conversation, the best idea is individual TB's for each
>cylinder with matching O2 sensors on the exhaust out and the computer
monitors
>each cylinders efficiency, adjusting each one independently. Like you say,
>this would be a totally custom computer application, you could probably
whack
>"Intel Inside" on the side of the car that actually had a mod like this
since
>a custom chip would cost WAY too much to make for this application. On the
>plus side, you could probably get as close to a perfect burn as is
>technologically possible. That would make the smog folks happy. I'd love
to
>see a system like this set up to run nitrous and/or a blower. Since it's
all
>custom programmed anyway, you could put large enough injectors in to dump
in
>plenty of fuel. Now the trick is to keep the heads on the block... ^_^
(BOOM!
> Well, there goes another one... NASA's gonna get pissed if we keep
orbiting
>these things!)
>
>Shaun H.
>
>---original message---
><< An idea for the truely experimental ones of you, take some lessons from
>jet
> > aircraft. You need a variable geometry >>
>Shaun,
>How about the old Six Pack idea! When the suction is up, the additional
TBs
>start to kick in. Not enough MAP signal, No addtional TBs...Stepper
>controlled TB WOT stops with a MAP and TPS based PID controller... The mind
>reels in the simplicity... Whos gonna code it? Any PIC microprocessor
>coders out there? It just takes time and money...
>Bruce
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:45 EDT