Re: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90

From: Richard Jacewitz (rjacew@webzone.net)
Date: Thu Aug 12 1999 - 12:45:19 EDT

Next message: McKinney, John R. MHX: "RE: Re: No More BFGoodrich Tires"
Previous message: Masso, Randy: "RE: Re[2]: No More BFGoodrich Tires"
In reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90"
Next in thread: Jetmugg@aol.com: "Re: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Original message:
HEY BOB, WHAT ARE YOU THINK'N, IT A NO BRAINER?? THE BIGGER THE TIRE THE
BIGGER THE DIAMETER, THUS THE MORE TIMES THE DRIVE SHAFT WILL TURN FOR EVERY
REVOLUTION OF THE TIRE.

For a good place to see how this might affect your gear ratio & speedo
readings
see Tire Rack tech page on tire sizes @
http://www.tirerack.com/tires/frames/tiretech_f.html

107 in Tulsa yesterday... can't wait till late Sept. when I can go
down to our local strip and for $10 you can 1/4 all night long...

Rich in T town
99 all black CC 5.2

Next message: McKinney, John R. MHX: "RE: Re: No More BFGoodrich Tires"
Previous message: Masso, Randy: "RE: Re[2]: No More BFGoodrich Tires"
In reply to: Barret, Matt: "RE: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90"
Next in thread: Jetmugg@aol.com: "Re: RE: Ring Gear changes: 3.55 vs. 3.90"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:45 EDT