Re: 4.10's or 4.30's

From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Date: Sun Aug 15 1999 - 04:23:00 EDT

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Gibson Cat-Back Install"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Maybe in reply to: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "4.10's or 4.30's"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated 8/14/99 9:23:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time, tigers@bserv.com
writes:

> Do you want to outrace an R/T? I would imagine you have higher
> hp and torque than a stock/mildly modified R/T with the SC and
> your current 3.90 gears.

Already done that, I just want to maximize my trucks potiential..
Thanks, Ted O.

Next message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Gibson Cat-Back Install"
Previous message: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Maybe in reply to: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "4.10's or 4.30's"
Next in thread: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Reply: Bernd D. Ratsch: "RE: 4.10's or 4.30's"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:15:48 EDT