Yeah, I have the 14x3" on my V8 and now that I have the headers, I think I
am switching to a tube system, after about 30 -40 mins I lose a TREMENDOUS
amount of power.
Bernd,
What did you do with your old setup? You have the Gen II now right?
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Thursday, September 02, 1999 10:46 PM
Subject: DML: RE: K&N FIPK ? (V-6)
>
>The round air filter/cleaners are pretty nice looking but a few of us (with
>the V6's) have switched over to the Intake Tubes since they allow for a
much
>cooler intake charge. I personally had originally installed a 10"x2.5"
>Edelbrock Round Air Cleaner on my Dak but promptly switched over to a 3"
>Intake Tube (now a K&N Gen-II). The truck was much happier and that
>annoying "whistle" at part throttle was gone as well. (Modified TB took
>care of that as well.)
>
>Bernd D. Ratsch
>Pflugerville, TX
>1997 Dodge Dakota SLT/CC - 2WD
>http://lonestar.texas.net/~bernd/Dakota.htm
>bernd@texas.net
>ICQ: 39320084
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Scott
>Miller
>Sent: Friday, April 02, 1999 7:34 PM
>To: Dakota Mailing List
>Subject: DML: K&N FIPK ? (V-6)
>
>
>Hey guys
>
>went and got a price on the new K&N FIPK tonight. $104.
>
>What does it include? Just a filter and an atachment for the throttle
body,
>or a tube and a filter. Any body got any input on the new style for a V-6
>dak, or would a regular open element work better. Also going for the
gibson
>swept side exhaust, being I can't find anyone who makes a split rear for a
>94 v-6 short bed.
>
>Later
>
>Scott Miller
>Shelby Dakota #322
>94 V-6 Dakota Sport
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:31 EDT