Re: RE: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6

From: Peter L Anthony (panthony@pcn.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 1999 - 01:19:35 EDT


No, you didn't come off that way. I'm just busting chops.
-----Original Message-----
From: SmokinDakota <webmaster@smokindakota.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Tuesday, September 07, 1999 1:00 AM
Subject: DML: RE: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6

>Well, when someone says my truck sounds ricey, I do take offense. If I
>wanted my truck to sound ricey I would have bought a Honda or such. To me,
>ricey sounds are high pitched, like a bumble bee. The Flowmaster has a deep
>tone and, to me, sounds nothing like a rice rocket. I don't hold a grudge
>and am not upset at all, sorry if I came off that way. On another note, I
am
>starting work on the So. Cal. Dak/Durango BBQ that went on last weekend.
>Here's a sneak peak
>http://www.smokindakota.com/socalBBQ/lineup.MPG
>
>Steven 2me
>http://www.smokindakota.com
>AOL IM = SmknDakTrk
>ICQ = 42763370
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Peter L
>Anthony
>Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 8:50 PM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: DML: Re: RE: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6
>
>
>Hey steven,
> Takin that WAY personal are we???
>J/K I'd take offense to that too.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: SmokinDakota <webmaster@smokindakota.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Monday, September 06, 1999 3:54 PM
>Subject: DML: RE: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6
>
>
>>So your calling my truck ricey, huh. That's one way to piss me off. Do you
>>have a subwoofer on your 'puter. If not then all your hearing are the high
>>frequencies. To all that have heard my truck in person(Jim, Sam, Tony, Ed,
>>etc) does it sound like a pissed off bee? If so, they need to release them
>>headers soon. Another thing, how will a 3 chamber Flowmaster sound less
>>ricey? It would just be a tad quitter, right? If you like the rumble of
the
>>V8's, then ya should have got a V8 buddy! Going to be hard to reproduce
>that
>>sound on a V6.
>>
>>
>>Steven 2me
>>http://www.smokindakota.com
>>AOL IM = SmknDakTrk
>>ICQ = 42763370
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of Nancy
>>Hoegen #229123
>>Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 10:49 AM
>>To: Dakota-Truck
>>Subject: DML: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6
>>
>>
>>Hey all,
>> My next mod will be the exhaust. I'd like to have Dual Pipes leading out
>>the rear of the truck (instead of the stock which is off too the right
side
>>rear). If I go dual, I know that I should probably have only a 2" diameter
>>for each pipe.
>>
>> Has anyone modified their 6er exhaust? I'd like your feedback.
Performance
>>is my primary concern, but SOUND is a close second ;-). I like the rumble
>of
>>the big V8s but I can't stand that "pissed off bee" rice burner sound.
(Ed,
>>I listened to the flowmaster on SmokinDak's message board - didn't like
it.
>>It had that "rice" sound, although my PC speakers aren't the best. Sounds
>>like 3-chamber Flowmaster or Dynomax Super Turbo for me.)
>>
>>Your experienced comments are welcome, especially from fellow 6ers who've
>>done it. (...is who've a word??? hmm).
>>
>>Later all
>>
>>
>>Kevin ~Stinger~ Hoegen
>>'99 Dak Sport CC V6 Solar Yellow
>>E-mail: mailto:hoegen@kersur.net
>>Dak Site: http://www.kersur.net/~hoegen
>>
>>By the way, if anyone knows a good easy Web building program I can get
>ahold
>>of lemme know, my site aint workin too good ;-(
>>
>>
>>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:34 EDT