Can anyone else refute the claim that the eRam did "little" for performance?
Bernd, you were raving about it a couple weeks ago, weren't you? Mine will
be here Friday, so I was just curious. -Jay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dester223@aol.com [SMTP:Dester223@aol.com]
> Sent: Monday, September 06, 1999 9:33 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Dual Exhaust for a 3.9L V6
>
> In my honest opinion. It really did little. it might be doing things on
> a
> bigger scale. but acceleration is basically the same as it was without it.
> -Dester
> PS. will bring out to the track to get timed, but i've added mods since,
> so i
> don't know how to give credit to the ones that actually work
>
>
> << So the e-ram did little? Was it worth the $300? I agree that the
> Flowmaster
> on a 6er is louder than a STOCK V8. But most "performance" mufflers I've
> heard are usually louder than stock exhaust systems. I know Ben has a wav
> file of a Gibson on his 6er, www.dakattack.com . My interior may rattle,
> but
> I can't tell if its the bass shakers or the exhaust. So I just turn up
> the
> radio and make it shake a little more. But the shakers are being removed
> for
> some woofers, any one interested in the shakers?
>
> Steven 2me
> http://www.smokindakota.com
> AOL IM = SmknDakTrk
> ICQ = 42763370 >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:35 EDT