I'm not call'n anyone 'smaller.' I was just point out that Tony does
realize that the 5.2 and the 5.9 have differences and he adjusts the TB bore
for those differences.
Remember - Bigger doesn't always mean better. droF and yvehC have yet to
figure this out.
John
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of JHarmon
>Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 11:05 PM
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Quick D
>
>
>Who you callin smaller cowpoke!
>
>John Mautz wrote:
>
>> I'm running the Quick D 51.75mm TB with Mesa Headers and Y-pipe
>on my 5.9L
>> Durango. I have noticed no ill effects and think it is great. Tony does
>> make a version a little smaller for the 5.2L.
>>
>> John
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
>> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
>> >Kabuki2@aol.com
>> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 1:04 PM
>> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>> >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Quick D
>> >
>> >
>> >In a message dated 9/8/99 10:06:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
>> >jmautz@home.com
>> >writes:
>> >
>> ><< I agree, Tony's Intake and TB are GREAT. Both have include great
>> > workmanship and both provided the desire results.
>> >
>> > John.
>> > '99 5.9L, 4x4, Durango >>
>> >
>> >I thought that 52mm was too large for a stock engine? Does
>anyone run this
>> >52mm TB w/ headers?
>> >
>> >ttyl
>> >Patrick
>> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:44 EDT