Just funnin John.
John Mautz wrote:
> I'm not call'n anyone 'smaller.' I was just point out that Tony does
> realize that the 5.2 and the 5.9 have differences and he adjusts the TB bore
> for those differences.
>
> Remember - Bigger doesn't always mean better. droF and yvehC have yet to
> figure this out.
>
> John
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of JHarmon
> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 11:05 PM
> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Quick D
> >
> >
> >Who you callin smaller cowpoke!
> >
> >John Mautz wrote:
> >
> >> I'm running the Quick D 51.75mm TB with Mesa Headers and Y-pipe
> >on my 5.9L
> >> Durango. I have noticed no ill effects and think it is great. Tony does
> >> make a version a little smaller for the 5.2L.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> >> >[mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> >> >Kabuki2@aol.com
> >> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 1999 1:04 PM
> >> >To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> >> >Subject: Re: DML: RE: Quick D
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >In a message dated 9/8/99 10:06:56 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> >> >jmautz@home.com
> >> >writes:
> >> >
> >> ><< I agree, Tony's Intake and TB are GREAT. Both have include great
> >> > workmanship and both provided the desire results.
> >> >
> >> > John.
> >> > '99 5.9L, 4x4, Durango >>
> >> >
> >> >I thought that 52mm was too large for a stock engine? Does
> >anyone run this
> >> >52mm TB w/ headers?
> >> >
> >> >ttyl
> >> >Patrick
> >> >
> >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:16:44 EDT