They had mine for 3 weeks, just to find out that I had to wait for a
computer flash.
Erika
>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:46:30 -0400
>
>Actually, the 100,000 mile warranty is what I wanted. All I really want is
>to GET MY TRUCK BACK! It has been at Arbor Dodge for 29 days strait.
>
>Mark
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>Date: Thursday, September 23, 1999 6:59 PM
>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>
>
>|For one... good luck. They will tell you in order to get another vehicle
>you
>|need to pay for tax tags and title all over again, you lose whatever money
>|you had down, and they deduct about 15 to 20 cents for every mile that is
>on
>|your vehicle. They will most likely offer you the 100,000 miles warranty
>|that has a $100 dollar detuctable. I tried to go after the lemon law too,
>|and this is what I went through. In other words, you GIVE them your truck,
>|and buy a NEW one at Cost. No trade, no nothing. The lemon law protects
>the
>|manufacturer and not the consumer. And in some states you can't even
>attempt
>|the lemon law if you are over 15,000 miles.
>|
>|Good luck.
>|
>|Erika
>|http://members.xoom.com/MsBavior/dakota
>|
>|
>|
>|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
>|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
>|>Subject: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 16:45:14 -0400
>|>
>|>Subject: Help! Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
>|>
>|>
>|>Some of you have probably wondering why there have been no updates to my
>|>webpage page recently, the reason is that my truck developed transmission
>|>problems in July and has been in and out of service since.As a matter of
>|>fact, Today makes day # 33. I have already given Chrysler Corp. the Lemon
>|>Law notification.
>|>
>|>If anyone has had a Lemon Law case, please let me know what they are
>going
>|>to offer. I really just want my truck back, but I may never get the truck
>|>back because the Michigan Lemon Law gives the dealer a maximum of 30 days
>|>to
>|>fix any problem with the vehicle. Last I checked, the transmissions are
>|>back-ordered for another 7 days, unfortunately, my truck has now been in
>|>service for 33 days! Looks like I might be getting a new truck or a
>payoff.
>|>
>|>If you were wondering what was wrong, I have made up a list of the
>problems
>|>below
>|>
>|>Date, Duration, Problem(s) / Solution(s).
>|>
>|>07/12/1999 1 day
>|>Broken cup-holder, fog lights inoperative, transmission not shifting into
>|>3rd gear. Cup holder was replaced, light switch
>|>was replaced, no work done on transmission, rescheduled
>|>for 07/26/1999.
>|>
>|>07/26/1999-07/30/1999 5 days
>|>Scheduled for transmission work, problem getting worse.
>|>Nothing was done until a tech test-drove it just before close
>|>of business on 7/28/99, I was told the parts were ordered.
>|>By 07/30/1999, the parts had still not shown up and I was
>|>told the tech was leaving on vacation that day. I picked up the vehicle
>and
>|>called the Chrysler Customer Service
>|>Department.
>|>
>|>08/26/1999-09/22/1999 28 days
>|>Excuses given; (1) wrong parts were ordered, (2) parts are
>|>backordered, (3) a tool needed to be ordered for the work,
>|>(4) the tool company lost the order because of a computer
>|>crash, (5) new transmission was ordered, (6) it was the wrong
>transmission,
>|>(7) another transmission is on order, (8) we dont break em', we just fix
>|>them!
>|>
>|>
>|>
>|
>|______________________________________________________
>|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>|
>
>
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:06 EDT