Re: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?

From: Mark Kuzia (flyboy01@worldnet.att.net)
Date: Sat Sep 25 1999 - 23:18:42 EDT


Michigan law says 4 times for the same problem or 30 days.
Mine was in for 35 days(they have an extra 5 days after the notification to
fix it).

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Date: Saturday, September 25, 1999 12:51 AM
Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?

|How many times has your vehicle been in for warranty work, and how many
|miles do you have on the truck?
|
|
|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 18:53:32 -0400
|>
|>I got my truck back today, the very last day they had before the lemon law
|>went into effect. THOSE BASTARDS!
|>
|>Mark
|>Trans feels like new though, because it is.
|>
|>-----Original Message-----
|>From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
|>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|>Date: Friday, September 24, 1999 12:39 AM
|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>
|>
|>|They had mine for 3 weeks, just to find out that I had to wait for a
|>|computer flash.
|>|
|>|Erika
|>|
|>|
|>|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
|>|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
|>|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|>|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>|>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 19:46:30 -0400
|>|>
|>|>Actually, the 100,000 mile warranty is what I wanted. All I really want
|>is
|>|>to GET MY TRUCK BACK! It has been at Arbor Dodge for 29 days strait.
|>|>
|>|>Mark
|>|>
|>|>
|>|>-----Original Message-----
|>|>From: Erika Ipes <msbavior@hotmail.com>
|>|>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|>|>Date: Thursday, September 23, 1999 6:59 PM
|>|>Subject: Re: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>|>
|>|>
|>|>|For one... good luck. They will tell you in order to get another
vehicle
|>|>you
|>|>|need to pay for tax tags and title all over again, you lose whatever
|>money
|>|>|you had down, and they deduct about 15 to 20 cents for every mile that
|>is
|>|>on
|>|>|your vehicle. They will most likely offer you the 100,000 miles
warranty
|>|>|that has a $100 dollar detuctable. I tried to go after the lemon law
|>too,
|>|>|and this is what I went through. In other words, you GIVE them your
|>truck,
|>|>|and buy a NEW one at Cost. No trade, no nothing. The lemon law protects
|>|>the
|>|>|manufacturer and not the consumer. And in some states you can't even
|>|>attempt
|>|>|the lemon law if you are over 15,000 miles.
|>|>|
|>|>|Good luck.
|>|>|
|>|>|Erika
|>|>|http://members.xoom.com/MsBavior/dakota
|>|>|
|>|>|
|>|>|
|>|>|>From: "Mark Kuzia" <flyboy01@worldnet.att.net>
|>|>|>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
|>|>|>To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
|>|>|>Subject: DML: Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>|>|>Date: Thu, 23 Sep 1999 16:45:14 -0400
|>|>|>
|>|>|>Subject: Help! Has anyone got a new vehicle under the Lemon Law?
|>|>|>
|>|>|>
|>|>|>Some of you have probably wondering why there have been no updates to
|>my
|>|>|>webpage page recently, the reason is that my truck developed
|>transmission
|>|>|>problems in July and has been in and out of service since.As a matter
|>of
|>|>|>fact, Today makes day # 33. I have already given Chrysler Corp. the
|>Lemon
|>|>|>Law notification.
|>|>|>
|>|>|>If anyone has had a Lemon Law case, please let me know what they are
|>|>going
|>|>|>to offer. I really just want my truck back, but I may never get the
|>truck
|>|>|>back because the Michigan Lemon Law gives the dealer a maximum of 30
|>days
|>|>|>to
|>|>|>fix any problem with the vehicle. Last I checked, the transmissions
are
|>|>|>back-ordered for another 7 days, unfortunately, my truck has now been
|>in
|>|>|>service for 33 days! Looks like I might be getting a new truck or a
|>|>payoff.
|>|>|>
|>|>|>If you were wondering what was wrong, I have made up a list of the
|>|>problems
|>|>|>below
|>|>|>
|>|>|>Date, Duration, Problem(s) / Solution(s).
|>|>|>
|>|>|>07/12/1999 1 day
|>|>|>Broken cup-holder, fog lights inoperative, transmission not shifting
|>into
|>|>|>3rd gear. Cup holder was replaced, light switch
|>|>|>was replaced, no work done on transmission, rescheduled
|>|>|>for 07/26/1999.
|>|>|>
|>|>|>07/26/1999-07/30/1999 5 days
|>|>|>Scheduled for transmission work, problem getting worse.
|>|>|>Nothing was done until a tech test-drove it just before close
|>|>|>of business on 7/28/99, I was told the parts were ordered.
|>|>|>By 07/30/1999, the parts had still not shown up and I was
|>|>|>told the tech was leaving on vacation that day. I picked up the
vehicle
|>|>and
|>|>|>called the Chrysler Customer Service
|>|>|>Department.
|>|>|>
|>|>|>08/26/1999-09/22/1999 28 days
|>|>|>Excuses given; (1) wrong parts were ordered, (2) parts are
|>|>|>backordered, (3) a tool needed to be ordered for the work,
|>|>|>(4) the tool company lost the order because of a computer
|>|>|>crash, (5) new transmission was ordered, (6) it was the wrong
|>|>transmission,
|>|>|>(7) another transmission is on order, (8) we dont break em', we just
|>fix
|>|>|>them!
|>|>|>
|>|>|>
|>|>|>
|>|>|
|>|>|______________________________________________________
|>|>|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|>|>|
|>|>
|>|>
|>|
|>|______________________________________________________
|>|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
|>
|>
|
|______________________________________________________
|Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:09 EDT