Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)

From: W. Jack Hilton III (HEMI@charter.net)
Date: Sun Sep 26 1999 - 09:18:14 EDT

Next message: W. Jack Hilton III: "Re: 6 speed in a dak,"
Previous message: ElCid19@aol.com: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
In reply to: Bob B Ford: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
Next in thread: Ramsport96@aol.com: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 06:33 PM 9/25/99 -0700, you wrote:
>
>
>On Sat, 25 Sep 1999 15:57:21 EDT GG428@aol.com writes:
>>has anybody else seen the article yet??

Anyone else shit on themselves when on page 58 they claim it pumps out
"...upwards of 13 pounds of boost..." . I am sorry , but that can't be
right .

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

W. Jack Hilton III

ICQ#: 32611901

AOL Instant Messenger: "DwnSth69"

@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@

Next message: W. Jack Hilton III: "Re: 6 speed in a dak,"
Previous message: ElCid19@aol.com: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
In reply to: Bob B Ford: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
Next in thread: Ramsport96@aol.com: "Re: new truck'n issue (factory performance conparison)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:10 EDT