RE: Re: Dynomax(Super Turbo) Info

From: Scott Miller (kmiller@cvn.net)
Date: Wed Apr 28 1999 - 22:33:53 EDT


I say go for the rhino. I think that is what I'm gonna put on my v6 dak. I
downloaded a couple of files, and I liked what I heard. They sound pretty
much the same as a Flowmaster, and they are the only company I've found so
far that offers a split rear for a 94 v6

later

Scott Miller
Shelby Dakota #322
94 V-6 Dakota Sport

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net
> [mailto:owner-dakota-truck@buffnet4.buffnet.net]On Behalf Of
> GrnDak4x4@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 1999 6:43 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: Re: Dynomax(Super Turbo) Info
>
>
> In a message dated 9/28/99 4:35:24 PM Central Daylight Time,
> nosdakota@email.msn.com writes:
>
> << I don't have one on my dakota but on my other mopar and it ran
> the same
> e.t.
> with open 3" pipe as it did with the super turbo. I don't like the sound
> though. It's not loud or exceptionally quiet but it sounds whimpy. >>
>
> Ok well thanks, now I have to start researching a new
> muffler!!!!!!! Noway a
> wimpy muffler is going on my Dak4x4!!!!!! Previously, I have narrowed my
> choices down a 3Chambered Flowmaster, a Gibson, Super Turbo, or a
> Rhino.....now what!!!!!! One less muffler to consider I guess!!
> Thanks for
> the input though :)
> Kyle
> 93 Dakota 4x4 V6
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:15 EDT