Well, there you have it then. These only ones I've ever seen are sold as
'kits' or 'plans'. I would still need to see proof that they work in the
form of a controlled test. Until then, I'll remain skeptical. By the way.
If if is indeed a detector/jammer. The detector portion requires an FCC
statement because they can leak RF. Hence, the result is the VG2 detector
detector. I don't debate that the detector portion of your device works, I
simply question the jammer portion.
I also enjoy the exchange of ideas with people who have views other than my
own. (My ex just said I like to argue, what the hell did she know anyway!)
Mike G.
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 21:50:40 -0500
From: "Bernd D. Ratsch" <bernd@texas.net>
Subject: DML: RE: RE: RE: RE: Spank? Well sort of..but funny (jammers)
The Phantom has a FCC compliancy notice on their manual. (So much for that
idea) ;)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:20 EDT