I've had the Jet II for a while now and drove around with and
without it (without it to the dealer for warranty stuff) - there
is a "seat-of-the-pants" difference to me.
I also experienced the "spikes" during a dyno run with the Jet II.
The Tech said that it appeared that plugs were a problem (I had
the Bosch Platinum in at the time) didn't ru dyno without though.
He also said that AC Delco Rapidfire plugs were good
plugs (on other vehicles).
Although there is no application for the 97 5.2, I've installed
the Rapidfire #5 plugs, (96 application) and have had no problems.
I wouldn't mind seeing some kind of dyno comparison on the
Jet or Hypertech.
Neal
97 CC, 5.2L, Auto, 4x2, Gibson Single Catback, Gibson Headers,
Jet Stage II
---Original Message:
From: GS- <GSWillhite@ualr.edu <mailto:GSWillhite@ualr.edu> >
Subject: DML: Re: Jet or Hypertech
>Good questions to ask but, it appears only a few have
>good Jet chips.
>Its pretty obvious that there are many bad Jet II chips
>out there and why the hell not draw a conclusion? 3 years
>on a dyno, you think he would know a bad product when he
>sees it. I heard enough of THIS one to want to wait on the
>MP computer or possibly the Hypertech, but I'm going to
>wait to see some positive and Negative feedback.
>GS -
>98 5.2L 5spd
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:17:56 EDT