Re: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)

From: SS454454@aol.com
Date: Sun Oct 31 1999 - 02:27:29 EST

Next message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: DC?"
Previous message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re: Re: New dodge"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)"
Next in thread: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Well its a 6.something sec to 7.5 sec depending on who tested it. And the
Ford is supposed to be a 5.5 but id give it a realistic 6.5 sec . Remember
you wont always have optimum conditions to run the truck at the advertised
times.
Rob

Next message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: DC?"
Previous message: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Re: Re: New dodge"
Maybe in reply to: Bernd D. Ratsch: "Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)"
Next in thread: SS454454@aol.com: "Re: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda Long)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:18:37 EDT