RE: RE: Re: Death of the Pushrod(6.1 hemi/ cammer)

From: Barret, Matt (MATT_BARRET@EARTHTECH.COM)
Date: Mon Nov 01 1999 - 07:56:17 EST


Great idea Patrick, You got it man, the next V-8 whatever liter it is, will
be awesomwe!!
Matt

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Delgado [mailto:dadoctah@vitelcom.net]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 2:26 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: Death of the Pushrod(6.1 hemi/ cammer)

Jeez guys,
If the 4.7 is competition for the 360, it must be damn good!
Let's put this pushrod/ohc thing on the shelf until the 6.1L
hemi/cammer Ram engine comes out. If the 4.7's are already running
close to 5.9 times, the 6.1 would fly! Let's put our energy into
something productive and let's start bugging DC(like it helped with
the computers?) to put that engine in the next dak.
Dr. Pat
----------
>From: SuperNagz@aol.com
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: Death of the Pushrod
>Date: Sat, Oct 30, 1999, 8:18 PM
>

> Yea, and its no coincidence that the F-Body is a 350, and the Mustang is a
> 4.6L, and we all know that the F-Body is definately the faster of the two.
>
> (very similiar to the 360 vs. 4.7L debate, eh?)
>
> On a side note, the F-Body is also considerably heavier than the Mustang.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:18:59 EDT