Chill out Matt, this is the kind of attitude we find on the Manger list, not
on the DML. We all love out trucks, and all our trucks are different, learn
to accept that fact and show respect for other peoples' trucks.
____________________________________________
Jon Smith-Raleigh,NC-http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jdsmith4
'95 318 auto CC 4x4: Accel Supercoil, JBA headers,
dual glasspack, 14x3 FABM, F&B Stage I TB, !EGR,
MSD 8.5's, self-moded intake, 180 degree thermo,
ASP crank pulley, 16" Hayden elec. fan, MP SBEC,
BEST: 0-60 in 6.3 & 1/4mi 15.4@88.95
207.2 RWHP, 276.2 RW ft/lbs
ŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻŻ
----- Original Message -----
From: Barret, Matt <MATT_BARRET@EARTHTECH.COM>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Monday, November 01, 1999 8:03 AM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: Re: RE: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison (Kinda
Long)
> What??? I remember this summer alot of folk taking hacks at the 4.7L
before
> it came out, and now I start putting the facts out and all I get is a
bunch
> of whining from RT boys, well well well, funny how they change there
tune!!
> Matt
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Herrin [mailto:therrin@isaac.net]
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 11:14 PM
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: Re: RE: Motor Trend "Muscle 2000" Comparison
> (Kinda Long)
>
>
> "Barret, Matt" <MATT_BARRET@EARTHTECH.COM> wrote:
> >I know you RT guys are hating me but, hey, I'm defending my little 4.7L!
>
> Defending the 4.7 from what? I've not seen any R/T owners here
> ragging on the 4.7 engine. What I *have* seen is you repeatedly
> trying to goad the 5.9'ers into some kind of confrontation. Why not
> give it a rest? We're all Dak owners here, what's the point in
> picking a fight?
>
> Terry Herrin
> 99 FR CC R/T
> Wilmington, NC
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:18:59 EDT