Re: RE: 318 Hop Up, Heads VS NOS

From: nosdakota (nosdakota@email.msn.com)
Date: Thu Nov 04 1999 - 05:16:54 EST


That sounds like exactly what I'm doing exept I use 94 and the hyperthech.
Joe W.
87 Shelby Charger 13.9
98 Dakota 13.1
----- Original Message -----
From: Bernd D. Ratsch <bernd@texas.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 03, 1999 10:44 PM
Subject: RE: DML: RE: 318 Hop Up, Heads VS NOS

> I don't doubt NX with their "Don't have to retard" comments....but not
every
> engine is built alike. Some ping, some don't, some have better
tolerances,
> others rattle. If you don't ping with the 100-125HP shot, at least run
some
> good, quality, fuel (92 preferred).
>
> BTW: Without my Jet-II, I don't need to retard the timing either. I just
> like what the Jet does for the Dak when I don't use the juice.
>
> - Bernd
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
> Subject: Re: DML: RE: 318 Hop Up, Heads VS NOS
>
>
> In a message dated 11/2/99 2:25:16 PM Eastern Standard Time,
bernd@texas.net
> writes:
>
> << With almost 100K...I wouldn't do it. But...if the compression is fine,
> no
> oil blow-by, truck runs strong, and there's nothing really worn out on
the
> motor...100HP MAX. And don't forget a retard box... 2 degrees for every
> 50-70HP...on the average.
>
> - Bernd >>
>
> The 125 NOS kit would work fine with the stock Comp without any retard. If
> you go with the MP comp then you need to retard for Nitous use.
>
> Bill
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:04 EDT