Don't buy the Catco, buy the Dynomax, It has higher flow, costs less, has
almost no restriction.
Mark Kuzia
95 Dak 5.9L, 5-spd, 4.10-SG
13.790 @ 99.42 mph (2.091 60 ft)
99 Dak 5.2L, 5-spd, 3.92-SG
14.896 @ 91.08 mph (2.072 60 ft)
flyboy01@worldnet.att.net
http://home.att.net/~flyboy01/360Dakota.html
----- Original Message -----
From: Alan Short <ashort@flash.net>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 1999 5:39 PM
Subject: DML: Re: Catco cat
| >
| > Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 07:09:21 -0800 (PST)
| > From: Mike Sype <blue98dakota@yahoo.com>
| > Subject: Re: DML: Re: Catco cat
| >
| > Alan, did you stay with the stock pipe size or did you
| > move up to 2-3/4 or 3" with the cat. The reason I
| > wan't to change the cat is for more flow due to the
| > increase in inlet/outlet size.
| >
| > Mike Sype
|
| I stayed with the stock size, I just made sure there were no machine
| bent pipes at all. Full mandrel bends from front to back.
| The headers and downpipes are Mopar and the catback is a Gibson single
| out (like stock). The Catco is a bit shorter than the stock cat, so I
| had a new pipe put between the cat and the catback. All the joints are
| welded, from the downpipes back.
| The word on 3" is it kills your low end, so I would stick with the stock
| diameter.
| Alan S.
|
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:17 EDT