Just out of curiosity, why not just update the software in the 97 controller instead of changing too a 96 computer.......
Frank
---------------------- Forwarded by Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM on 11/21/99 08:07 PM ---------------------------
sst_ram@hotmail.com on 11/19/99 09:10:00 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net@Internet
cc: (bcc: Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM)
Subject: Re: DML: Re: M1 dyno verified Hp #s on a 360& observations(rev limiter)
I wish there was a way to get my rev limiter up a few and remove the stupid
speed limiter. We need the speedbrain company to make that computer for the
Dodges. I guess putting the gauges from a '96 in would be way too
difficult.
Bill
'97 Ram SS/T
JBA headers,Jet II,FIPK,rear 2inch drop,accel supercoil, Jacobs wires,Frank&Bruce TB,underdrive pulleys more to come...
>From: Bob Tom <tigers@bserv.com>
>Reply-To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net
>Subject: Re: DML: Re: M1 dyno verified Hp #s on a 360& observations(rev
>limiter)
>Date: Sat, 13 Nov 1999 15:23:30
>
>At 11:43 AM 11/13/99 EST, you wrote:
> >That doesnt make your gauges non functional? I had heard
> >that they wouldnt work if you put a '96 on there. Bill
>
>The instrument gauges do not work when you use the '96 MP PCM
>in the '97 truck. Basically, the sensors were wired directly
>to the dash in the '96 trucks while, for the most part, the
>sensors' signals are sent to the computer then sent via a
>data bus to another computer in the dash, and then by a
>data bus to the instrument panel in the '97+s.
>
>The advance timing, different air/fuel ratio map, speed limiter
>removal and raised rev limited do work.
>
>Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
>'97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:21 EDT