RE: Re: M1 dyno verified Hp #s on a 360& observations(rev limiter)

From: Frank T Holloway (Frank.T.Holloway@KP.ORG)
Date: Mon Nov 22 1999 - 17:33:25 EST


Bernd,

The only time you really need to play around with the sensors is when you are not changing the computer. Remember, the sensors are just inputs to the computer, the primary outputs from the computer are the ignition timing and the fuel pulse. When you are changing the output variables, it really doesn't matter if the input variables are right on factory specs, the results from the inputs (timing and fuel) are what you are concerned with......

        Frank
---------------------- Forwarded by Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM on 11/22/99 02:29 PM ---------------------------

bernd@texas.net on 11/22/99 12:34:00 PM
To: dakota-truck@buffnet.net@Internet
cc: (bcc: Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM)
Subject: RE: DML: Re: M1 dyno verified Hp #s on a 360& observations(rev limiter)

I'm mainly after "Blueprinting" the sensors (setting them to exact
tolerances). This proved to be quite successful on earlier vehicles that
we did and showed HP and MPG gains as well. (FORD EEC-III and EEC-II
mainly but GM was included as well as OBD-I)

- Bernd

At 07:46 AM 11/22/1999 -0800, you wrote:
>Bernd,
>
>We currently set the RPM limiter at 6,000, top speed at 999 mph. These can
>be set at anything we want. Ignition curve is modified and the fuel map is
>pretty much left alone. For engines with bolt on items (including mild
>cams) this is pretty much all that you need. Sensor recalibration needs to
>be done in conjunction with a good exhaust gas analyzer.......
>
> Frank
>---------------------- Forwarded by Frank T Holloway/CA/KAIPERM on
>11/22/99 07:45 AM ---------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:22 EDT