Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?

From: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com
Date: Tue Nov 23 1999 - 11:30:34 EST

Next message: Tim Berry: "Re: RE: Burnout Qestions, Low RPMs"
Previous message: ZeNel1eac1@aol.com: "Re: RE: Burnout Qestions, Low RPMs"
Maybe in reply to: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Next in thread: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

In a message dated Tue, 23 Nov 1999 11:19:35 AM Eastern Standard Time, Mst29@aol.com writes:

> Can i run a 98 mopar computer without a t-stat and get no pinging?

Why would you do that ? It'll take forever for your motor to get to operating temp, thats not good for it..

Next message: Tim Berry: "Re: RE: Burnout Qestions, Low RPMs"
Previous message: ZeNel1eac1@aol.com: "Re: RE: Burnout Qestions, Low RPMs"
Maybe in reply to: fawcett@uism.bu.edu: "Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Next in thread: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:28 EDT