Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?

From: Bob Tom (tigers@bserv.com)
Date: Tue Nov 23 1999 - 14:40:47 EST

Next message: Bob Tom: "Lug pattern?"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: So CAL dml"
In reply to: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Next in thread: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

At 11:03 AM 11/23/99 EST, you wrote:
>Can i run a 98 mopar computer without a t-stat and get no pinging?

If you mean without a 180 tstat (with the stock 195 tstat),
then yes it's possible it won't ping but it'll need 92 octane gas.

Bob. Southern Ontario, Canada.
'97 Dakota CC Sport, FR, 5.2L, 3.55 SG, auto.

Next message: Bob Tom: "Lug pattern?"
Previous message: Bob Tom: "Re: So CAL dml"
In reply to: Mst29@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Next in thread: TEDSDAKOTA@aol.com: "Re: Re[2]: Not reaching operating temp?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:29 EDT