Hi John
I'm not a big cam expert but that sounds like pretty tame cam that shouldn't
mess up drivability too much. I know when you ge up into the 280 duration
range it gets to be a bit radical for the street. What did they say the
power range would be on that cam?
Joe W.
87 Shelby Charger 13.9
98 Dakota 13.1
----- Original Message -----
From: John Mautz <jmautz@home.com>
To: <dakota-truck@buffnet.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 1999 9:25 PM
Subject: DML: Hughes Engines Cam selection
> Hi all in DML land!
>
> I know at least one of you has installed a Hughes Cam but I don't remember
> which one and I would like to know how which one you went with and how the
> install went.
>
> I'm thinking of their HER0612AL Magnum Roller Cam for my '99 5.9L Durango.
>
> Here are the cam specs:
>
> Lift @1.6 ratio: in/ex .512"/.512"
> Dur @ .2": in/ex = 126/131
> Dur @ .05": in/ex = 208/214
> Ad Dur @ .02": in/ex = 258/260
> LSA: 112
> Open @ .05" tappet lift: in/ex = 12 ATC/36 BBC
> Close @ .05" tappet lift: in/ex = 40 ABC/2 BTC
>
> They make hotter cams but if the magnum roller cam fits their other
> descriptions this would most likely be my best choice, but if you picked a
> different one I would like to what your reasons were (I could be wrong in
my
> thinking).
>
> Hughes Engines web site is http://hughesengines.com.
>
> Thanks,
> John.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jun 20 2003 - 12:19:35 EDT